The event, which transpired on the 26th of August, unfolded across 19 distinct locations within Petaling Jaya. According to the information presented in their promotional materials, participation was restricted to individuals possessing valid shooting licenses, with a cap of 30 contestants allowed.
Tensions escalated when a video depicting a participant taking aim at a crow began circulating on Twitter. While some individuals supported the event, others voiced vehement opposition.
Notably, supporters highlighted the potential financial gains, with one user revealing that shooters could earn between RM15 to RM25 for each successfully downed crow. Some users even suggested additional locations that the Petaling Jaya City Council could consider for future events.
Conversely, critics questioned the ethical implications of ending innocent lives for sport. Among the criticisms, concerns about safety resonated strongly. Detractors emphasized the risks associated with stray bullets and missed shots, which could potentially harm bystanders or unintended targets.
As the controversy rages on, opinions remain divided. The event has prompted a broader discussion about the balance between pest control efforts and ethical considerations.
Share your thoughts in the comments section below.
