A must-have meal during Ramadan, Roti John is a beloved egg and meat baguette dish that many in Malaysia claim as their own. However, Singaporeans beg to differ.

In a recent video by Padu Beb Studios documenting a food hunt in Singapore, an unexpected debate erupted in the comments section. Singaporeans passionately defended their claim to the dish, insisting that Roti John's true origins lie in the Lion City.

@padubebstudios

Roti John Ori Dari Singapore Guna French Loaf? #PaduBebBros #RotiJohn #Singapore

original sound - Padu Beb Studios

While Malaysia's version of Roti John is typically drenched in sauce, loaded with vegetables, and sometimes even enhanced with unique additions like crispy fried chicken skin, Singapore's take on the dish is noticeably different.

According to the host of the video, "In Singapore, a French baguette is used to add a crunchier bite."

He further explained, "The filling here consists of lamb and eggs, but what sets it apart is the lack of excessive sauce."

This subtle but significant difference fueled the debate, with many Singaporean commenters asserting their ownership of the dish.

"The original Roti John came from Taman Serasi, Kebun Bunga, Singapore," one user declared.

Another commented, "The real version is more like a Subway sandwich, made with a French baguette and it is far superior just like our murtabak."

One particularly detailed response claimed, "This is the original Roti John, and it's traditionally eaten with sambal. Cik Shukor from Taman Serasi was the one who first created it by slicing open a baguette and filling it with meat and eggs."

With both sides standing firm in their beliefs, the question remains: who can truly lay claim to Roti John? Regardless of its origins, one thing is certain the dish continues to be a staple in both countries, enjoyed by generations on either side of the Causeway.